What’s in a Name? Labeling the Mystic

“What is a mystic anyway, besides an eccentric weirdo who fits in nowhere and in no place, someone who is seen by most Christians as too esoteric for the faith, and by the New Age movement as a dinosaur of a bygone era–the age of Pieces, anyone?–best left buried?….”

Indigo Onyx

“I’m a Mystic,” I told them. They’d known me for years but I’d never come clean about it before, because I knew they wouldn’t like it very much.

“You’re a what?” Alice asked. “Is that like a witch?” Her eyes got all big as if she thought I was about to cast a spell on her.

“Isn’t that a sin?” Kendra said from across the table in a low whisper.

I took a deep breath and tried to explain myself…

cf5a8d2416ee41db05ecc8d5ec4c654fPinterest 

What is a mystic anyway, besides an eccentric weirdo who fits in nowhere and in no place, someone who is seen by most Christians as too esoteric for the faith, and by the New Age movement as a dinosaur of a bygone era–the age of Pieces, anyone?–best left buried?

Merriam-Webster defines mystic as:

Of or relating to mysteries or esoteric rites

Relating to mysticism or mystics

Mysterious

Obscure

View original post 872 more words

6 thoughts on “What’s in a Name? Labeling the Mystic

  1. Darcy, if you’re ever made privy to the answer to the vexing question mystics face of knowing what mystics
    are here for I hope you will post it so I can reblog it here.

    I know the scientfic world that’s studyiing the phenomenon of mysticism in unversities around the world will be more than just interested.

    The question of What Now? has vexed my existence ever since my annual mystic experiences from the age of about 15 to my late 30’s.

    Onwards and upwards!

    Keith.

    Like

  2. Many in Judaism say “Kabbalah is nonsense, but at least it is Jewish nonsense.” In Islam many Muslims regard Sufism as heretical and Sufis themselves as “kafir,” unbelievers.

    Like

  3. From my own experiences I am convinced if you have religion in you you are not a mystic. The very idea is an oxymoran. The proposition lacks mystical experience. Religions are man made, the mystic experience is not. The experience is not even acessible to humans on their own volition. Historically, it is imposed on some humans for reasons yet unknown; it is caught, not taught. Religions have nothing to do with it.

    Best wishes, Keith.

    Like

  4. I disagree and agree… You can be a mystic and religious, as were the best known mystics of the past. You do not, however, have to be religious or believe in God to be a mystic.

    Like

    1. Mystics of the past had no choice but to belong to the cultural religion of their times or, as many did, face torture, death, mutilation, torture, life imprisonment , confiscation of written works, bullying and harrassment, even genocide, – all of which was extended to their partners, friends and followers. This even happens today, as you mention, Ron. But religions cannot win against the mounting evidence of the reality of mystic experience, as can be seen by the dimunition not to say extinction of religions today. Reality will out.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to Darcy Branwyn Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s