I’m identified as Brahm, or Buddhist, but despite my experiences identifying me as a pratyeka buddha, I’m neither.
“Pratyekabuddhayān translates to ‘solitary buddha‘ or ‘a buddha on their own’. The pratyekabuddha is an individual who independently achieves liberation without the aid of teachers or guides and who does not teach others.” (Wikipedia)
So what do I call myself, bearing in mind there are no names in Reality? I don’t call myself anything, not even Vedic, Egyptian, Taoist, Hermetic, or Sufi, though all these, to my astonishment when I first found out about them, all contain my experiences that I kept secret for 60 years or so as unique to me!
By comparison I find Judaism, Christianity and Islam faint shadows of the experiences of Reality as revealed by the purity of the Vedic, Egyptian, Taoist, Hermetic, or Sufi traditions. (Real Sufism is just MER, not uniquely anything man made).
They all record Reality as being all things known and unknown, knowing from experienced detail the all-connected, infinitely multiple and active complexities of an existence that mystics seem to know and that science is only just beginning to suspect.
What these traditions also reveal to us is that this Mystic Experience of Reality (MER) has been around for many thousands of years, probably from the very beginning. And we are that.
Names don’t reveal us.