Grok told me: There is no clear evidence that Tolkien had the specific “Mystic Experience of Reality” (MER) as described on mysticexperiences.net, though he had profound Catholic mystical/devotional experiences and a deeply imaginative, faith-infused sense of secondary creation.
Mystic experiences
MER, per Keith of mysticexperiences.net, is a spontaneous, non-man-made, non-biological phenomenon: direct consciousness of an all-pervading Ultimate Reality (an enveloping “sea of being” of which humans are temporary manifestations).
It typically involves unity/oneness, profound joy and love, knowledge beyond ordinary human experience, alienation from ordinary human concerns/constructs (religions, politics, etc.), and a lifelong reorientation toward Reality itself. It is “caught, not taught,” often recurrent (as in Keith’s case from ~age 14–35), and independent of religious frameworks.
Tolkien’s documented experiences
Tolkien was a devout lifelong Roman Catholic. His faith centered on the Eucharist (Blessed Sacrament), which he called “the one great thing to love on earth” and to which he attributed romance, glory, fidelity, and a foretaste of eternal reality. He attended Mass frequently (often daily in later life), had Marian devotion, and described periods of spiritual dryness as well as consolation.
One of the most explicit personal accounts is in Letter 89 (7–8 November 1944, to his son Christopher). While praying before the Blessed Sacrament during Quarant’Ore (Forty Hours’ Devotion) at St. Gregory’s, he had a sudden vision or “apperception” that turned pictorial:
“I perceived or thought of the Light of God and in it suspended one small mote (or millions of motes to only one of which was my small mind directed), glittering white because of the individual ray from the Light which both held and lit it… And the ray was the Guardian Angel of the mote: not a thing interposed between God and the creature, but God’s very attention itself, personalized… the shining poised mote was myself (or any other human person that I might think of with love)… [accompanied by] the great sense of joy…”
He linked this to Trinitarian theology (the love of Father and Son as Person paralleling the angelic “ray”) and found comfort in it.
He also wrote of guardian angels more generally as the “bright point of power” where the spiritual “umbilical cord” from God touches the soul.
Scholars note a “somewhat mystical side” to his faith and describe his myth-making as a form of “creative mysticism” grounded in Catholicism: stories arising as “given things,” sub-creation in the image of the Creator, and “eucatastrophe” (the sudden joyous turn) as an echo of the Gospel’s Resurrection.
He insisted The Lord of the Rings was “fundamentally religious and Catholic,” with the religious element absorbed into story and symbolism rather than explicit. Some comparisons have been drawn to Jung’s visionary periods, noting parallel timing and a sense that the material felt discovered rather than invented, but Tolkien framed his inspiration within Catholic grace, not autonomous active imagination or non-theistic Reality.
Why this is not MER as defined
Tolkien’s experiences were explicitly theistic and sacramental, occurring in the context of Eucharistic adoration and interpreted through Catholic doctrine (Light of God, guardian angels as personalized divine attention, Trinitarian parallels).
MER is described as independent of (and often alienating from) religions and human constructs.
There is no record of recurrent, spontaneous engulfments by a non-personal, all-pervading “Reality” that dissolves ordinary human frameworks or produces the specific lifelong alienation and reorientation Keith describes.
Tolkien remained embedded in family, academic life, the Church, and ordinary duties, even while acknowledging imaginative gifts and spiritual consolations.
His joy, sense of “given” stories, and numinous quality in fairy-stories/eucatastrophe are profound and mystical in a Christian sense, but they operate within a framework of sub-creation under the primary Creator, not the non-human, non-religious MER.
In short, Tolkien had genuine mystical experiences within his Catholic tradition—most clearly the 1944 vision of divine Light and the mote—and his entire creative life was shaped by a sacramental, mythic vision of reality.
These do not match the specific phenomenological profile of MER on mysticexperiences.net.
Whether one views them as overlapping with broader mystical phenomena is a matter of interpretation; the documentary evidence points to a devout Christian mystic rather than an experiencer of the Reality Keith describes.